Sales comparison approach
The sales comparison approach values a property by looking at what similar properties recently sold for, then adjusting for the differences.
It is the primary method for residential valuation, and the one a buyer, a seller and an appraiser are all implicitly using.
How it works#
Select comparable sales — recent, nearby, genuinely similar.
Adjust each one toward the subject property. The comparable had an extra bathroom, so deduct its contributory value. The subject has a finished basement the comparable lacked, so add.
Reconcile the adjusted figures into a value conclusion, weighting the comparables that needed fewer adjustments more heavily.
The direction of adjustment matters and is easy to get backwards: the comparable is adjusted, not the subject.
Adjustments signal reliability#
The number and size of adjustments tell you how comparable the comparable was.
A sale needing three small adjustments is strong evidence. One needing eight large ones is being stretched to fit, and the value it produces should carry less weight.
That is a useful discipline for anyone assembling their own comparables. If the adjustments are doing most of the work, the comparable is not comparable.
Where it fails#
Thin markets. Rural Minnesota with few sales in a year offers no raw material, which is exactly where assessed values and automated models also become unreliable.
Unusual properties. Large acreages, non-standard construction, mixed use. There are no peers to compare against.
Distressed sales. A sheriff's sale, a short sale or an estate sale is not an arm's-length transaction between willing parties, so it is poor evidence of market value — while being excellent evidence of what distressed property fetches, which is a different question.
Distressed sales as their own comparable set#
Worth separating, because both uses are legitimate.
Valuing a house at market, distressed sales are poor comparables and are generally excluded or adjusted heavily.
Valuing what a property will fetch at a sheriff's sale or a county land sale, distressed sales are the only relevant comparables and ordinary sales are the misleading ones.
Using the wrong set for the question is how after-repair values get overstated and how auction bids get set too high.
Against the other approaches#
Sales comparison — what similar properties sold for. Residential.
Income approach — what the income supports. Rental and commercial.
Cost approach — what it would cost to replace, less depreciation, plus land. New construction, unique properties, insurance.
An appraiser considers all three and weights whichever the evidence supports. On an ordinary house that is almost always the first.